does slate’s article on how to improve al qaeda’s english magazine aid and abet a terrorist organization? http://bit.ly/9f8jR5

since brietbart has demonstrably proven he’s an editorial assclown, can we agree to ignore him when he next crawls out from his cave?

you want the subscribers or the traffic? ~ times traffic drops 90% after paywall goes up: http://bit.ly/aqPLc0

and? ~ shut down blog network said to have unknowingly hosted “al qaeda” content: http://bit.ly/dAmvmb

waste not, want not ~ china now the world’s largest energy consumer: http://bit.ly/c0CBNm

i hope he keeps a goodly chunk of that ~ “Mike Allen’s Playbook… earns [Politico] $780,000 in annual ad-revenue.” http://bit.ly/dD3Mty

once upon a time “drunks with cigars wrote stories that were edited by constipated but knowledgeable people.” http://bit.ly/azTS2f

wow. just wow. in RI, looking for a local movie theater and came across this… this… web site: http://bit.ly/ctFFgM

good morning from rhode island: http://yfrog.com/b5p7mkj

joy to take you into the weekend ~ princess leia apprehended on the subway: http://bit.ly/97lyYn

please forward/make suggestions about upcoming interviewees ~ crowdsourcing the future journalism project: http://bit.ly/caZVeZ

this weekend’s @nytimes mag has a good profile of @StateDept’s digital diplomacy efforts - http://icio.us/2xt1gp

spent 20 minutes on @nytimes searching for a 1993 article. no luck. did one search query on google and it was the first hit.

paper bans user anonymity ~ “This is a necessary step… if [we are] going to continue to provide a forum for comments” http://bit.ly/aBjMK0